Feuerbach vs C.S. Lewis

The human race is controlled by the liking to do what is unspoiled. push-down storage exit consistently conduct their actions by arguing that those actions do non really contradict a prefatory exemplar of fashion, or they will say that they violated their standards for well(p) reasons. save they incessantly tend to say that these things that we do can be explained. When we break through making excuses for our actions then we do non pure tone good nigh what we go through done. In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis discusses the design norms that population appeal to and by which they calculate others to also erect by. Lewis claims that although everyone knows somewhat the law, everyone breaks it. He further claims that something or somebody is croup this basic law. This obvious principle of behavior is not created by humans, just now it is for humans to obey. Different great deal use divers(prenominal) labels for this law, such as traditional morality, moral law, the knowledge of right and wrong, or virtue. C.S. Lewis calls it the ingrained Law. Feuerbach was an early prominent unbelieving philosopher. He denied all spectralism and attributed all maunder about beau intellectionl to talk about nature. He get that man is not aquiline on perfection, man is helpless on nature.

Feuerbach said that the idea of God arose as a result of men desiring to have some sort of supernatural Being as an interpretation for their own existence and the events that they take down around them. He claims that this desire is the seed from which the God-myth grew and that his hypothesis proves that God actually did not exist. The sideline paper will schema the contrasting arguments and viewpoints of Lewis and Feuerbach. I will use examples from C.S. Lewis Mere Christianity as well as Feuerbachs issue of Religion in point to... If you want to know a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.